“En primer lugar quiero dejar bien en claro que la mayoría de los miembros de la iglesia adventista—especialmente fuera de los Estados Unidos de America del Norte– rechazan el aborto como una opción aceptable para un cristiano.
Sin embargo, la posición official votada por el Concilio Otoñal de la Conferencia General de la iglesia adventista en 1992 adopto un documento conocido como guia del aborto—“Guidelines on Abortion”—que justifica lo que el Señor prohibió en el sexto mandamiento que dice “No mataras.”
El responsable de este cambio tan radical fue el Pastor Neal Wilson …”
“When I joined the Adventist Church through baptism seven decades ago, I never imagined—not even in my wildest dreams—that the denomination I was joining would one day abandon the pro-life stance on abortion ardently defended by our Adventist pioneers and eventually actively participate in the killing of innocent unborn children for the sake of dirty profit.
A Dramatic Departure from Moral Duty
What prompted the Adventist leaders to make such a drastic departure from the right path? The answer is quite simple: Financial gain. Our Castle Memorial Hospital [CMH] located in the State of Hawaii was faced with a serious financial dilemma: The State legalized abortion, and the non-Adventist physicians at said institution demanded the right to offer elective abortion services to their patients. …”
“The church, to survive, needed a visible principle of unity, viz., the papacy. For the papacy to function effectively as the visible principle of unity however, the office needed to be endowed with the gift of infallibility.
As the pope of the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965), John XXIII, famously stated: “I am not infallible. The pope is only infallible when he speaks ex cathedra. I will never speak ex cathedra, therefore I am not infallible.” …
“Yesterday morning as I was walking to church, a video title popped into my mind: “Who Broke the Baby.” This morning I decided to Goggle this title and found the story behind it. A woman was busy with her computer and the image of an aborted baby flashed on the screen. Her three-year boy saw the image and asked with alarm: “Who broke the baby? Of course, there is a video and a book by said title. Today, I want to tell you the answer to the boy’s question:
“Who Broke The Baby?” by Dr. Jean Staker Garton
The State of Hawaii
The first to break the baby was the State of Hawaii. This took place in 1970 when the Supreme Court of said State decided to legalize the killing of the unborn. …”
“This bill amends the federal criminal code to make it a crime for a physician to knowingly perform an abortion: (1) without determining whether the fetus has a detectable heartbeat, (2) without informing the mother of the results, or (3) after determining that a fetus has a detectable heartbeat.
It provides an exception for an abortion that is necessary to save the life of a mother whose life is endangered by a physical (but not psychological or emotional) disorder, illness, or condition. …”
““Unbeknownst to my loved ones I was trapped in a ‘vegetative’ state, literally ‘locked in’ my own body,” Victoria shared, “constantly hearing doctors tell my family that it was highly unlikely that I would survive and if I did survive I’d be a ‘vegetable’ the rest of my life.” …
“The Kansas City Star reports that Doe had an abortion in May 2015 and had to comply with Missouri’s informed consent law.
It requires women to wait 72 hours before having an abortion, look at an ultrasound and sign a form which states they’ve read material that contains the line, “(t)he life of each human being begins at conception. Abortion will terminate the life of a separate, unique, living human being.” …”
Here is a video that explains this rather clearly:
“What about saving a mother’s life
Perhaps your understanding of our pro-life position is limited and incomplete. We are not against saving the life of the mother.
The sacred duty of a physician is saving lives. If a doctor can save only one life instead of two, he is still performing God’s work.
This I have explained on numerous occasions. You probably have never read a full explanation of our pro-life position.
The key word is motivation. If the motivation is to save lives, the work is justified; if the motivation is killing, it is not.
Saving lives is sacred work. Killing to save the lifestyle of a pregnant woman is not–it is murder.
I hope this video succeeds in clarifying this for you and others!
“Dear Adventist Pro-lifers,
I am writing to you while the rest of Loma Linda people are sound asleep. I woke up at 2:15 AM and started thinking about the future of our Adventist Church. After trying to go back to sleep for an hour or so without success, I decided to get up and write to you.
The Reason for my Concern
You may wonder what is the reason for my deep concern. The reason is quite simple. The hour for the Loud Cry is here and the church is asleep at the wheel. Those who founded our denomination were decidedly pro-life, but 47 years ago, Pastor Neal Wilson, the father of Ted Wilson, publicly announced that our church was leaning towards abortion because there was too much hunger and there were too many people in the world. …”
“The conclusion that human life begins at sperm-egg fusion is uncontested, objective, based on the universally accepted scientific method of distinguishing different cell types from each other and on ample scientific evidence (thousands of independent, peer-reviewed publications). Moreover, it is entirely independent of any specific ethical, moral, political, or religious view of human life or of human embryos. …
““The emergencies that we hear about are only a fraction of what is happening, and do not count abortion emergencies where women have been hospitalized after the left the abortion facility for the day. These serious incidents are ignored by the news media, which does women a disservice by concealing the truth about abortion dangers from them.” …
“Mosher, long recognized as an expert in China’s domestic policy, started his address by explaining that the earth’s temperature has always fluctuated, sometimes dramatically.
“We had global warming and ice ages a long time before human beings invented the internal combustion engine, and a long time before there were a million or us running around the planet giving birth to little ‘carbon dioxide emitters,’“ he quipped, quoting how climate change activists refer to children.
“This is the biggest scientific fraud ever perpetrated on the family of man.” …