gender

“The book instead encourages the use of terms such as cisgender, for children who identify with the gender in which they were born.

It also uses the terms ‘genderqueer’ and ‘panromantic’, meaning someone who is attracted to people of all gender identities. …”

More: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/education/schools-told-to-stop-calling-pupils-boys-and-girls-in-gender-diversity-drive-a3417491.html?utm_source=email+marketing+Mailigen&utm_campaign=News+12.21.16&utm_medium=email

Advertisements

About adventlife

I am a second generation Adventist who joined the church by baptism almost seven decades ago when the Adventist Church was still pro-life. I have a Ph. D. Degree in religion, and my dissertation was entitled "From Pro-life to Pro-choice: The Dramatic Shift in Seventh-day Adventists' Attitudes Toward Abortion." I recently published a book with said title which is available at http://lulu.com. You need to type my name in the Search blank space to access it. I believe that the Adventist Church should get out of the abortion business, especially out of the elective type of abortions. The church did compromise on this moral issue back in 1970 and many of its hospitals were allowed to profit from the killing of innocent unborn babies with impunity. The church needs to repent of this great moral sin and publicly admit that it was wrong for the "Remnant," Church which keeps God's Commandments, to profit from what the Bible and our Adventist pioneers labeled as murder. The Lord is merciful and forgiving, but public sins must be publicly repented of in order to secure God's forgiveness. P.S.: I recently published my second book dealing with abortion and the Adventist Church. The title is: “Murder in Paradise: A Serious Warning to the United States & the Adventist Church” http://www.lulu.com/shop/search.ep?type=Print+Products&keyWords=Samojluk+murder+in+paradise&x=5&y=10&sitesearch=lulu.com&q= Paperback: List Price: $22.49 $9.00 You Save: 60%

4 responses »

  1. That does not mean that people have to do that. Freedom of speech does not exist.

  2. The question of being male or female would be self evident had clothing optional be allowed. The negative stigma of being nude needs to be removed. People would end up choosing to be the sex that they were born to be. This society insisting on clothing covering those parts contributes to people wanting to be another sex. Clothing ends up defining what sex you are rather than the God made parts on your body. Clothing optional needs to be law. Clothing optional needs to be encouraged. The laws themselves are contributing to the problem.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s